9/10/2006

Caffeine and fatigue

So I have been experiencing some chronic fatigue lately and I am trying to track down the causative agent. Excluding the possibility of viral infection or parasitic agent (for want of practical means of determining presence of aforementioned theory) I am left with a usual suspect: caffeine.

I drink a lot of coffee lately to keep awake. But lately coffee just doesn't have that "kick." I think I may be stuck in a vicious cycle, or to put it another way I have reached the point of diminishing returns with the use of coffee.

Why do I think its coffee (more specifically caffeine) that's causing my chronic fatigue? Well, I wont bore you with an elaboration of my symptoms, but suffice it to say I normally get very tired during the day around noon or thereafter and am able to sleep for a few hours if allowed but sleep tends to be unrefreshing. This is troubling. I have noticed that since school started back I have been tired despite the lack of strenuous physical exertion. I drink a coffee in the morning and then maybe a couple at night.

Thankfully the Internet provides many fine technical/scientific answers that elaborate my predicament.

As I understand it Caffeine inhibits the decomposition of cAMP (Cyclic adenosine monophosphate) into AMP. cAMP is an important analog of ATP (and we should all know what that stands for by now).

According to wikipedia's fine article on cAMP:

"cAMP is a second messenger, used for intracellular signal transduction, such as transferring the effects of hormones like glucagon and adrenaline, which cannot get through the cell membrane. Its main purpose is the activation of protein kinases; it is also used to regulate the passage of Ca2+ through ion channels."

As can be inferred from the above the inhibition of so critical a substance in the human body over a prolonged period of time must surely result in changes both gross and subtle. One idea is that by inhibiting the breakdown of cAMP into AMP intracellular calcium stores become prematurely depleted, resulting in a cascading effect. Calcium dependent secondary messenger processes become less effective as a result. This is just one possibility, in fact there are many. In any case a good reason to take a break from coffee for a week and see if energy levels don't bounce back.



  • Calcium-Induced Calcium Release Contributes to Action Potential-Evoked Calcium Transients in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons



  • Biochemistry/Second Messenger



  • Cyclic_adenosine_monophosphate
  • 8/17/2006

    Danny Glover's "Cahhp Killuz"

    The image “http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Mel-Gibson-Danny-Glover---Lethal-Weapon-Photograph-C10103063.jpeg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    Lets say a .40 S&W Subsonic bullet moves at 1000 ft/sec.

    So...

    (1K ft)/Sec Converted to miles/hour

    Equals 681.818 miles/hour

    The speed of sound is approx: 340.29 meters/sec @ sea level

    so...

    340.29 meters/sec converted miles/hour

    Equals 761.207 miles/hour


    The image “http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/05/03/43da5495-002d1-06450-400cb8e1” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.



    Killaz:
  • Subsonic .40 S&W/a>
  • 8/07/2006

    Generation IV Nuclear power

    Getting back to basics at the 5 directorate folks. Found this gem of a PDF that shows the various reactor designs that will meet future energy needs. Be careful, choose wisely. Our vote naturally goes to the HTGCR designs, but I'm also partial to Super critical H20 and CO2.


  • Idaho National Laboratories Future energy programs (PDF)
  • 8/05/2006

    7/28/2006

    The economy of my Virginia trip...

    Balanced equation:

    2 C8H18 + 25 O2--> 16CO2 + 18H2O

    According to my chemistry book 1 gal of C8H18 combust to produce 9.3 kg CO2.

    Our trip to Virgina used 44 gals of gas (87 octane) so...

    44 gals x .87 octane = 38. 28 gals octane x 9.3kg CO2 = 356.004 kg CO2.

    This seems to make sense since 44 gallons of octane weighs about 124kg. Octane weights 5.85 lbs per gal. 5.85 x 44 gal = 257.4 lbs (116.75 kg).

    So... 356 x 2 = 712 kg CO2 total produced for round trip.

    7/22/2006

    Trauzl

    Trauzl lead block test
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search

    Trauzl lead block test, also called Trauzl test or just Trauzl, is a test used to measure the strength of explosive materials. It was developed by Isidor Trauzl in 1885.

    The test is performed by loading a 10 gram foil-wrapped sample of the explosive into a hole drilled into a lead block with specific dimensions. The hole is then filled with sand and the sample is detonated electrically. After detonation, the volume increase of the cavity is measured. The result is given in cm3 and is caled the Trauzl number of the explosive.

    A variant of the test uses aluminium block.
    This explosives-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
    Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauzl_lead_block_test"

    Categories: Explosives stubs | Explosives

    Brisance

    Brisance
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search

    Brisance is a measure of the rapidity with which an explosive develops its maximum pressure.

    In addition to strength, explosive materials display a second characteristic, which is their shattering effect or brisance (from the French meaning to "break"), which is distinguished from their total work capacity. This characteristic is of practical importance in determining the effectiveness of an explosion in fragmenting shells, bomb casings, grenades, and the like. The rapidity with which an explosive reaches its peak pressure is a measure of its brisance. Brisance values are primarily employed in France and Russia.

    A brisant explosive is one in which the maximum pressure is attained so rapidly that a shock wave is formed, and the net effect is to shatter material surrounding or in contact with it. Thus brisance is a measure of the shattering ability of an explosive.

    The sand crush test is commonly employed to determine the relative brisance in comparison to TNT. No single test is capable of directly comparing the explosive properties of two or more compounds; it is important to examine the data from several such tests (sand crush, trauzl, and so forth) in order to gauge relative brisance. True values for comparison will require field experiments.

    One of the most brisant conventional explosives is Cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (also known as RDX).